Abstract :
This research delves into an expansive exploration of pivotal theories within the domain of mass communication, shedding light on their foundational principles, contemporary relevance, and empirical substantiation. This article navigates through a spectrum of influential theories, each offering distinct perspectives on media’s role in shaping societal narratives, influencing public opinion, and constructing cultural norms. Commencing with Agenda Setting Theory, the research scrutinizes the media’s capacity to mold public discourse by dictating the salient topics and issues. Moving forward, Cultivation Theory offers insights into the cumulative effects of media exposure on individuals’ perceptions of reality, emphasizing the enduring impact of media consumption on societal beliefs and attitudes. Uses and Gratifications Theory provides a user-centric lens, focusing on the motivations driving media engagement and underscoring individual preferences and choices in the evolving media landscape. Social Learning Theory explores the influential role of media in shaping behaviors through observational learning, resonating in its relevance for comprehending media’s impact on societal norms and behaviors. Framing Theory illuminates the media’s presentation of information and its effect on audience perceptions, crucial for discerning biases in content. Media Ecology Theory examines the interplay between media, technology, and society, offering insights into the evolving communication landscape in the digital age. Gate-keeping Theory highlights the role of gatekeepers in content selection and dissemination, persisting albeit in transformed forms in the evolving media ecosystem. Cultural Imperialism Theory investigates the unequal power dynamics in global media, emphasizing the impact on cultural diversity. Semiotics and Semiology analyze the language of signs and symbols, crucial for deciphering complex meanings within media messages and cultural artifacts. This research paper illuminates the multifaceted realm of mass communication, offering invaluable frameworks for comprehending media’s influence in an ever-evolving media-rich world.

Keywords :
Agenda Setting, Communication Theories, Cultural Diversity, Cultural Dynamics, Digital Media Landscape, Mass Communication, Media Effects, Media Influence, Media Semiotics, Social Learning.

–

References :

• Adams, P. C. (2009). Geographies of media and communication: John Wiley & Sons.
• Adolf, M. (2011). Clarifying mediatization: Sorting through a current debate. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 153-175.
• Ahmed, S., & Matthes, J. (2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International communication gazette, 79(3), 219-244.
• Aiello, G., & Parry, K. (2019). Visual communication: Understanding images in media culture: Sage.
• Alozie, E. C. (2010). Advertising and culture: Semiotic analysis of dominant symbols found in Nigerian mass media advertising. Journal of Creative Communications, 5(1), 1-22.
• Altheide, D. L. (2003). The mass media. Handbook of symbolic interactionism, 657-684.
• Andersen, T. H., Boeriis, M., Maagerø, E., & Tonnessen, E. S. (2015). Social semiotics: Key figures, new directions: Routledge.
• Anderson, C. (2020). Practice, interpretation, and meaning in today’s digital media ecosystem. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 97(2), 342-359.
• Ang, I. (2006). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences: Routledge.
• Athique, A. (2017). Transnational audiences: Media reception on a global scale: John Wiley & Sons.
• Baker, S. A., & Rowe, D. (2013). The power of popular publicity: new social media and the affective dynamics of the sport racism scandal. Journal of Political Power, 6(3), 441-460.
• Balnaves, M., Donald, S. H., & Shoesmith, B. (2017). Media theories and approaches: A global perspective: Springer Nature.
• Barnhurst, K. G., Vari, M., & Rodríguez, Í. (2004). Mapping visual studies in communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 616-644.
• Bennett, P., Kendall, A., & McDougall, J. (2011). After the media: Culture and identity in the 21st century: Routledge.
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731.
• Benson, R., & Neveu, E. (2005). Bourdieu and the journalistic field: Polity.
• Bertrand, I., & Hughes, P. (2017). Media research methods: Audiences, institutions, texts: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame: Routledge.
• Biocca, F. (1989). Semiotics and Mass Communication Research: Key Intersections. SebeokT. A. Umiker-SebeokJ.(Eds.), The Semiotic Web, 471-530.
• Biocca, F. A. (2012). Opposing conceptions of the audience: The active and passive hemispheres of mass communication theory. In Communication yearbook 11 (pp. 51-80): Routledge.
• Blumler, J. G., Dayan, D., & Wolton, D. (1990). West European perspectives on political communication: Structures and dynamics. European Journal of Communication, 5(2), 261-284.
• Boczkowski, P., & Lievrouw, L. A. (2007). Bridging STS and communication studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies. The handbook of science and technology studies, 949-977.
• Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E., & Matassi, M. (2018). “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New media & society, 20(10), 3523-3539.
• Boler, M. (2008). Digital media and democracy: Tactics in hard times: MIT Press.
• Bolin, G. (2016). Media generations: Experience, identity and mediatised social change: Routledge.
• Bolin, G., & Hepp, A. (2017). The complexities of mediatization: Charting the road ahead. Dynamics of mediatization: Institutional change and everyday transformations in a digital age, 315-331.
• Borchers, T. (2012). Persuasion in the media age: Waveland Press.
• Boyd-Barrett, O., & Rantanen, T. (1998). The globalization of news: Sage.
• Bria, F. (2013). Social media and their impact on organisations: building firm celebrity and organisational legitimacy through social media.
• Brown, J. A. (2013). Television’, critical viewing skills’, education: Major media literacy projects in the United States and selected countries: Routledge.
• Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 662-704.
• Buckingham, D. (2013). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture: John Wiley & Sons.
• Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (2004). Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use: Psychology Press.
• Cardoso, G. (2008). From mass to networked communication: Communicational models and the informational society. International journal of communication, 587-630.
• Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(6), 1457-1469.
• Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of Podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. The international journal of press/politics, 21(3), 378-397.
• Castelli Gattinara, P., & Bouron, S. (2020). Extreme-right communication in Italy and France: political culture and media practices in CasaPound Italia and Les Identitaires. Information, Communication & Society, 23(12), 1805-1819.
• Chesebro, J. W., & Bertelsen, D. A. (1998). Analyzing media: Communication technologies as symbolic and cognitive systems: Guilford Press.
• Clausen, L. (2003). Global news production: Copenhagen Business School Press DK.
• Cohen MA, J. N., & Mihailidis, P. (2013). Exploring curation as a core competency in digital and media literacy education.
• Connell, I., & Mills, A. (1985). Text, discourse and mass communication. Discourse and communication, 26-43.
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2005). Designs for social futures. In Multiliteracies: Lit learning (pp. 201-232): Routledge.
• Cottle, S. (2006). EBOOK: Mediatized Conflict: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Cottle, S. (2014). Rethinking media and disasters in a global age: What’s changed and why it matters. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 3-22.
• Couldry, N. (2015). Listening beyond the echoes: Media, ethics, and agency in an uncertain world: Routledge.
• Creeber, G., & Martin, R. (2008). Digital culture: Understanding new media: Understanding new media: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Crowley, D. J., & Mitchell, D. (1994). Communication theory today: Stanford University Press.
• D’Angelo, P., Lule, J., Neuman, W. R., Rodriguez, L., Dimitrova, D. V., & Carragee, K. M. (2019). Beyond framing: A forum for framing researchers. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 96(1), 12-30.
• Danesi, M. (2013). Encyclopedia of media and communication: University of Toronto Press.
• Danesi, M. (2015). The Semiotics of the Mass Media. International handbook of semiotics, 485-502.
• Davis, A., Fenton, N., Freedman, D., & Khiabany, G. (2020). Media, democracy and social change: Re-imagining political communications: Sage.
• Davis, D. K., & Puckett, T. F. (1992). Mass entertainment and community: Toward a culture-centered paradigm for mass communication research. Annals of the international communication association, 15(1), 3-34.
• De Mooij, M. (2014). Human and mediated communication around the world. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London: Springer.
• Dena, C. (2009). Transmedia practice: Theorising the practice of expressing a fictional world across distinct media and environments.
• Downing, J., Downing, J. D., Mohammadi, A., & Sreberny, A. (1995). Questioning the media: A critical introduction: Sage.
• Downing, J. D., McQuail, D., Schlesinger, P., & Wartella, E. (2004). The SAGE handbook of media studies.
• Edwards, L., & Hodges, C. E. (2011). Public relations, society & culture: Theoretical and empirical explorations: Taylor & Francis.
• Ehrat, J. (2011). Power of Scandal: Semiotic and Pragmatic in Mass Media: University of Toronto Press.
• Ernst, W. (2012). Digital memory and the archive (Vol. 39): U of Minnesota Press.
• Erstad, O., & Amdam, S. (2013). From protection to public participation: A review of research literature on media literacy. Javnost-The Public, 20(2), 83-98.
• Fahmy, S., Bock, M., & Wanta, W. (2014). Visual communication theory and research: A mass communication perspective: Springer.
• Fedorov, A. (2017). Media and information literacy education dictionary: Scholars’ Press.
• Fenton, N. (1999). Mass media. Sociology: Issues and debates, 297-320.
• Fiske, J. (2010a). Introduction to communication studies: Routledge.
• Fiske, J. (2010b). Television culture: Routledge.
• Flew, T. (2018). Understanding global media: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Fortner, R. S., & Fackler, P. M. (2014). The handbook of media and mass communication theory: John Wiley & Sons.
• Fourie, P. J. (2010a). An Examination of the Value of the Concept of the” Semiosphere” in the Study of Mass Communication: Testing the Value and Feasibility of a Proposed Research Project. Razón y Palabra(72).
• Fourie, P. J. (2010b). Media studies: Media history, media and society (Vol. 2): Juta and Company Ltd.
• Fry, D. L., & Fry, V. H. (1986). A semiotic model for the study of mass communication. Annals of the international communication association, 9(1), 443-462.
• Gaines, E. (2008). Media literacy and semiotics: Toward a future taxonomy of meaning.
• Gambier, Y., & Gottlieb, H. (2001). (Multi) media translation: concepts, practices, and research (Vol. 34): John Benjamins Publishing.
• Gane, N., & Beer, D. (2008). New media: The key concepts: Berg.
• Gottdiener, M. (1985). Hegemony and mass culture: A semiotic approach. American journal of sociology, 90(5), 979-1001.
• Hansen, A. (1998). Mass communication research methods: NYU Press.
• Hardy, J. (2014). Critical political economy of the media: An introduction: Routledge.
• Hartley, J. (2012a). Communication, cultural and media studies: The key concepts: Routledge.
• Hartley, J. (2012b). Digital futures for cultural and media studies: John Wiley & Sons.
• Hartley, J., Ibrus, I., & Ojamaa, M. (2020). On the digital semiosphere: Culture, media and science for the Anthropocene: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of mediatization: John Wiley & Sons.
• Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Researching transforming communications in times of deep mediatization: A figurational approach. Communicative figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, 15-48.
• Hesmondhalgh, D., & Toynbee, J. (2008). The media and social theory: Routledge.
• Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society: Routledge.
• Hjorth, L., Burgess, J., & Richardson, I. (2012). Studying mobile media: Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone: Routledge.
• Hodgetts, D., & Chamberlain, K. (2014). Analysing news media. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 380-393.
• Holmes, D., & Jones, P. (2011). Key concepts in media and communications. Key Concepts in Media and Communications, 1-272.
• Ibrahim, I., & Sulaiman, S. (2020). Semiotic communication: An approach of understanding a meaning in communication. International Journal of Media and Communication Research (IJMCR), 1(1), 22-31.
• Ito, M. (2013). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media: The MIT press.
• Jacquemet, M. (2005). Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & communication, 25(3), 257-277.
• Jankowski, N. W., & Jensen, K. B. (2002). A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research: Routledge.
• Jeffres, L. W., Neuendorf, K., Bracken, C. C., & Atkin, D. (2008). Integrating theoretical traditions in media effects: Using third-person effects to link agenda-setting and cultivation. Mass communication and society, 11(4), 470-491.
• Jensen, K. B. (1991). When is meaning? Communication theory, pragmatism, and mass media reception. Annals of the international communication association, 14(1), 3-32.
• Jensen, K. B. (2002). Media audiences: Reception analysis: mass communication as the social production of meaning. In A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 135-148): Routledge.
• Jensen, K. B. (2018). After convergence: constituents of a social semiotics of mass media reception. In The audience and its landscape (pp. 63-74): Routledge.
• Jenson, K. B. (1991). ‘When Is Meaning? Communication Theory, Pragmatism, and Mass Media Reception. Communication yearbook, 14, 3-32.
• Kellner, D. (2003). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the post-modern: Routledge.
• Kellner, D. (2020). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity, and politics in the contemporary moment: Routledge.
• Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005a). Media Literacy in the US. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 11, 1-21.
• Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2005b). Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 26(3), 369-386.
• KhosraviNik, M., & Unger, J. W. (2016). Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. Methods of critical discourse studies, 205-233.
• Kim, S.-H., Han, M., Choi, D.-H., & Kim, J.-N. (2012). Attribute agenda setting, priming and the media’s influence on how to think about a controversial issue. International communication gazette, 74(1), 43-59.
• Kline, S., Dyer-Witheford, N., & De Peuter, G. (2003). Digital play: The interaction of technology, culture, and marketing: McGill- Queen’s Press-MQUP.
• Koivisto, J., & Thomas, P. D. (2010). Mapping communication and media research: Conjunctures, institutions, challenges: University of Tampere.
• Kraidy, M. (2006). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization: Temple University Press.
• Krampen, M. (1997). Semiosis of the mass media: Modeling a complex process. Semiotics of the media: state of the art, projects and perspectives, 87-98.
• Krendl, K. A., & Warren, R. (2013). Communication effects of noninteractive media: Learning in out-of-school contexts. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 70-89): Routledge.
• Kress, G. (2005). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In Multiliteracies: Lit Learning (pp. 149-157): Routledge.
• Lacey, N. (2018). Image and representation: Key concepts in media studies: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Lemke, J. (2013). New Media, New Literacies. International Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Volume II.
• Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world, 283301.
• Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2002). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs: Sage.
• Lin, C. A. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13(4), 345-365.
• Lindell, J. (2015). Bourdieusian media studies: returning social theory to old and new media. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 16(3), 362-377.
• Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2010). Theories of human communication: Waveland press.
• Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. Young People and New Media, 1-278.
• Livingstone, S. (2003a). The changing nature of audiences: From the mass audience to the interactive media user. A companion to media studies, 337-359.
• Livingstone, S. (2003b). Media audiences, interpreters and users.
• Livingstone, S., & Das, R. (2013). The end of audiences? Theoretical echoes of reception amid the uncertainties of use. A companion to new media dynamics, 104-121.
• Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: An emerging paradigm for media and communication studies.
• Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E., & Thumim, N. (2014). Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies: Disciplinary, critical, and methodological issues. In Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 103-132): Routledge.
• Louw, E. (2001). The media and cultural production: Sage.
• Macedo, D. P. (2007). Media literacy: A reader: Peter Lang.
• Martin, B. (2014). Semiotics and the Media. The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory, 56-73.
• Matusitz, J. (2013). Terrorism and communication: Sage.
• McGuigan, J. (2004). EBOOK: Rethinking Cultural Policy: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• McNair, B. (2006). Cultural chaos: journalism and power in a globalised world.
• McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (Vol. 5): Taylor & Francis.
• McQuail, D. (1985). Sociology of mass communication. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1), 93-111.
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication research, 41(8), 1042-1063.
• Meyrowitz, J. (2008). Power, pleasure, patterns: Intersecting narratives of media influence. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 641- 663.
• Miller, T., & Kraidy, M. M. (2016). Global media studies: John Wiley & Sons.
• Moores, S. (2007). Media/theory: thinking about media and communications: Routledge.
• Morley, D. (2003). Television, audiences and cultural studies: Routledge.
• Mosharafa, E. (2015). All you need to know about: The cultivation theory.
• Murphy, P. D., & Kraidy, M. M. (2003). International communication, ethnography, and the challenge of globalization. Communication Theory, 13(3), 304-323.
• Murphy, P. D., & Kraidy, M. M. (2004). Towards an Ethnographic Approach to Global Media Studies 1. In Global Media Studies (pp. 3-18): Routledge.
• Murthy, C. (2012). Indian cinema as a model for de-Westernizing media studies: A comparative study of Indian philosophical and Western cultural theories. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 22(2), 197-215.
• Nielsen, R. K. (2014). Political communication research: New media, new challenges, and new opportunities. MedieKultur, 30(56).
• Nightingale, V. (1996). Studying audiences: The shock of the real: Psychology Press.
• Ognyanova, K., & Monge, P. (2013). A multitheoretical, multilevel, multidimensional network model of the media system: Production, content, and audiences. Annals of the international communication association, 37(1), 67-93.
• Oliver, M. B., Raney, A. A., & Bryant, J. (2019). Media effects: Routledge New York, NY.
• Pamment, J. (2014). The mediatization of diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 9(3), 253-280.
• Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 35-65.
• Pertierra, A. C. (2018). Media anthropology for the digital age: John Wiley & Sons.
• Peterson, M. A. (2003). Anthropology and mass communication: Media and myth in the new millennium (Vol. 2): Berghahn Books.
• Piette, J., & Giroux, L. (2018). The theoretical foundations of media education programs. In Media Literacy Around the World (pp. 89-134): Routledge.
• Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital media, culture and education: Theorising third space literacies: Springer.
• Press, A., & Livingstone, S. M. (2006). Taking audience research into the age of new media: Old problems and new challenges: Wiley Online Library.
• Ramasubramanian, S., & Banjo, O. O. (2020). Critical media effects framework: Bridging critical cultural communication and media effects through power, intersectionality, context, and agency. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 379-400.
• Real, M. R. (1980). Media theory: Contributions to an understanding of American mass communications. American Quarterly, 32(3), 238-258.
• Rlindlof, T. (1988). Media audiences as interpretive communities. Annals of the international communication association, 11(1), 81- 107.
• Rosenberry, J., & Vicker, L. A. (2017). Applied mass communication theory: A guide for media practitioners: Routledge.
• Rössler, P. (2017). The international encyclopedia of media effects, 4 volume set: John Wiley & Sons.
• Rowe, D., & Brass, K. (2011). ‘We take academic freedom quite seriously’: How university media offices manage academic public communication. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 7(1), 3-20.
• Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass communication & society, 3(1), 3-37.
• Schrøder, K. C. (2019). Audience reception research in a post-broadcasting digital age. Television & New Media, 20(2), 155-169.
• Scolari, C. A. (2009). Mapping conversations about new media: the theoretical field of digital communication. New media & society, 11(6), 943-964.
• Scolari, C. A. (2012). Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory. Communication Theory, 22(2), 204-225.
• Scolari, C. A. (2015). From (new) media to (hyper) mediations. Recovering Jesús Martín-Barbero’s mediation theory in the age of digital communication and cultural convergence. Information, Communication & Society, 18(9), 1092-1107.
• Scolari, C. A. (2018). Media evolution. Mediated communication, 149-168.
• Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research: Cambridge university press.
• Siapera, E. (2010). Cultural diversity and global media: The mediation of difference: John Wiley & Sons.
• Siles, I., & Boczkowski, P. (2012). At the intersection of content and materiality: A texto-material perspective on the use of media technologies. Communication Theory, 22(3), 227-249.
• Smith, P. (1994). The semiotic foundations of media narratives: Saddam and Nasser in the American mass media. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 4(1-2), 89-118.
• Sorrells, K. (2020). Intercultural communication: Globalization and social justice: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
• Spurgeon, C. (2007). Advertising and new media: Routledge.
• Staiger, J. (2005). Media reception studies: NYU Press.
• Steinberg, S. (2007). An introduction to communication studies: Juta and Company Ltd.
• Stevenson, N. (2002). Understanding media cultures: Social theory and mass communication. Understanding Media Cultures, 1-256.
• Storey, D., & Sood, S. (2013). Increasing equity, affirming the power of narrative and expanding dialogue: the evolution of entertainment education over two decades. Critical Arts, 27(1), 9-35.
• Sullivan, L. E. (2009). The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences: Sage.
• Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: London: Pluto Press.
• Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media: Stanford University Press.
• Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication.
• Thorne, S. L. (2013). Digital literacies. Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives, 192-218.
• Towner, T. L., & Muñoz, C. L. (2018). Picture perfect? The role of Instagram in issue agenda setting during the 2016 presidential primary campaign. Social science computer review, 36(4), 484-499.
• Tudor, A. (1995). Culture, mass communication and social agency. Theory, Culture & Society, 12(1), 81-107.
• Tumber, H., & Waisbord, S. (2019). The Routledge companion to media and scandal: Routledge.
• Tyner, K. (2014). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information: Routledge.
• Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, culture & society, 31(1), 41-58.
• Volkmer, I. (1999). News in the global sphere: A study of CNN and its impact on global communication: Indiana University Press.
• Waisbord, S. (2016). Translations|Communication studies without frontiers? Translation and cosmopolitanism across academic cultures. International journal of communication, 10, 19.
• Waisbord, S. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline: John Wiley & Sons.
• Wajcman, J., & Jones, P. K. (2012). Border communication: Media sociology and STS. Media, culture & society, 34(6), 673-690.
• Watson, J., & Hill, A. (2012). Dictionary of media and communication studies: A&C Black.
• Watson, J., & Hill, A. (2015). Dictionary of media and communication studies: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Wilkins, K. G., Tufte, T., & Obregon, R. (2014). The handbook of development communication and social change: John Wiley & Sons.
• Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discursive pragmatics, 8, 50-70.
• Wong, M. (2019). A social semiotic approach to text and image in print and digital media: Springer.
• Yar, M. (2012). Crime, media and the will-to-representation: Reconsidering relationships in the new media age. Crime, media, culture, 8(3), 245-260.
• Zhao, X., Zhan, M., & Jie, C. (2018). Examining multiplicity and dynamics of publics’ crisis narratives with large-scale Twitter data. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 619-632.
• Zhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 79-98.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER